I currently own a Canon Powershot S80 and am planning on upgrading to a dSLR. I am looking into getting either a Nikon D40 or a Canon Rebel Xt. I’m leaning towards the D40 because it feels better in my hand, has a larger lcd, and is cheaper. However, the Canon Rebel Xt, based on the reviews I’ve read, supposedly produces better images. Will I even see a major difference by upgrading from my point and shoot camera (my canon s80 is an 8 mp point and shoot)? Will I see a decrease in quality going to a 6mp slr (the nikon d40) from an 8mp point and shoot?
Related Blogs
- Stretching Your Dollars
- Nikon D40 Digital Camera With 18-55mm Lens & 70-210mm! | Digital SLR Cameras | Digi SLR
- lenovolaptop » Blog Archive » 2 Replacement Canon NB-2LH Batteries and Mini Battery Charger for Canon SLR Digital Rebel XT, XTi, & Powershot G9, G7, S80, S70, S60, S50 Digital Cameras
- Laptop Hard Drive » Blog Archive » Canon EH-18L Semi-Hard Case for the EOS Digital Rebel XT/XTi Camera
- Best Buy Multipack (2 count): Replacement Battery for Specific Digital Camera and Camcorder Models / Compatible with CANON DC310, DC320, DC330, Elura 40 MC, Elura 50, Elura 60, Elura 65, Elura 70, Elura 80, Elura 85, Elura 90, MV5, MV5i, Optura 30, Optura
Other articles you might like;
- article submissions » The Snappiest Snaps – The Best Digital Camera Prices under $250 will Fetch You
- Compact Digital Cameras Can Satisfy Even the Most Power Hungry Photographer | Article Drop
- Compact Digital Cameras Can Satisfy Even the Most Power Hungry Photographer | Family Articles | Ezine Articles Store | Ezine Article Directory Store
- Great Suggestions On Canon Camera Accessories | Interviewhelper Articles
Tagged with: 6mp • canon • canon powershot • canon powershot s80 • canon rebel • canon rebel xt • canon s80 • dslr • images • mp • nikon d40 • point and shoot camera • powershot s80
Filed under: Canon Rebel XT Reviews
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
You will see an unbelieveable improvement in your upgrade from a point and shoot to an SLR. The size of the sensor is very important – not to mention that you will find the lens quality is vastly superior. This is not 100% applicable in your situation, but it is educational nonetheless: http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/476181751/
Nikon D40 vs. Canon EOS 350D (Rebel XT)
I have never used a Canon EOS 350D, so I can’t actually compare the cameras, but I favor the D40 because it has a spotmeter and the 350D doesn’t. Although the D40 seems small, it is practically the exact same size as the 350D.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=canon_eos350d%2Cnikon_d40&show=all
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond40/page17.asp
tells us that the Canon 350D meter calibration is off by about 1/3 of a stop. This would not really present any problems, except that it suggests "something" to me about the quality, since the Nikon and Pentax are dead on.
Scroll on down the page for image comparisons. The D40 is clearly sharper and shows less noise at all ISO settings.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond40/page18.asp shows us that both handle shadows equally, but the D40 clips the highlights by about 1/3 of a stop.
This next paragraph directly addresses your concerns about the 8 MP vs. 6 MP issue. You will see that it’s not so much the number of the pixels (as long as they are in the same league), but what you do with them that counts.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond40/page21.asp shows a side-by-side of studio images. The 8 MP of the Canon 350D at least put the camera on equal footing with the Nikon D40 for image quality, but you have to take note that the Rebel XT is shot at ISO 100 and the Nikon is shot at it lowest setting of ISO 200. I think the Canon images may look a little better, but we know from the prior page that under equal lighting levels, the Canon will start to break up before the Nikon.
The reviewer says, "While it is possible to pick areas of the image which lend some credence to the EOS 350D’s 34% pixel count advantage it’s clear that the average observer would not notice these differences and that you would need a very large output size for any of them to become visible."
Check this out…
http://dpreview-img.fotki.com/gallery/canoneos350d_samples1/originals/img_4068-raw-dpp.jpg is taken by the Canon 350D with a 17 mm focal length at f/6.3, 1/80th of a second, ISO 400 using RAW.
http://dpreview-img.fotki.com/gallery/nikond40_samples/originals/dsc_1206.jpg is taken with the Nikon D40 with an 18 mm focal length at f/4.5, 1/80th of a second, ISO 400 using jpeg.
The point of focus for the Canon photo is a bit deeper than it is for the Nikon, but even having 8MP and using RAW and a smaller aperture, I think the Canon image breaks up a lot more than the Nikon. You can barely make out the features on the face of the gentleman in the background. Is this the camera or the superiority of the Nikon 17-55 lens, which so many of us here praise???
Okay, I’ve made my stance clear. I like the Nikon D40 better than the Canon EOS 350D, so here’s my general review of the D40.
The Nikon D40 is a great little camera, very easy to use and quite reasonably priced. It has a few "consumer friendly" totally automatic modes that make it very easy to use, but still offers total photographic control when you are ready to take charge. It will get you in the Nikon family which is a great place to be. If you buy accessories and lenses, you will be able to use everything on any Nikon that you might upgrade to later on.
Check out Nikon’s "Picturetown" promotion, where they handed out 200 D40′s in Georgetown, SC. http://www.stunningnikon.com/picturetown/
Here are a few reviews, in case you have not read them yet. Be sure to note that they are several pages long and some of the reviews also have some sample images that you can look at.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond40/
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/nikon_d40.html
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3756/camera-test-nikon-d40.html
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40/d40-recommendations.htm
I hate to see people slam the camera because it can’t autofocus with older Nikon lenses. It is true that there is a "slight problem" with older Nikon lenses not autofocusing on the D40, but if you do not own a bag full of older lenses, it is not going to be a problem. It is barely a problem anyhow. If you check http://www.nikonusa.com for "AF-S" lenses, which are ALL 100% compatible with the D40, you will find 23 lenses, including 7 "VR" (vibration Reduction) lenses and one true macro lens with "VR". There are another 25-plus lenses in the current catalog that provide all functions except autofocus as well as many (possibly dozens) "out of print" lenses that will work just as well. In addition, although these lens will not autofocus, most of them will still give focus confirmation. From the D40 manual: "If the lens has a maximum aperture of f/5.6 of faster, the viewfinder focus indicator can be used to confirm whether the portion of the subject in the selected focus area is in focus. After positioning the subject in the active focus area, press the shutter release button halfway and rotate the lens focusing ring until the in-focus indicator is displayed." (See http://www.members.aol.com/swf08302/nikonafs.txt for a list of AF-S lenses.)
The D40 only has 3 autofocus zones arranged horizontally at the center, 9 o’clock and 3 o’clock positions. This might be considered a limitation, but realistically, most people will find this perfectly adequate, especially if you are moving up from a point and shoot with only a center zone.
You can get the D40 with the 18-55 kit lens at B&H Photo available through Yahoo! Shopping or at 1-800-622-4987) for $525 (June 2007). Add a Lexar Platinum (60X speed) card for $25 or 2 GB for $35. Or – get the D40 with 18-135 lens and 1 GB Lexar card for $750. They also have used D40′s from $475.
And yet… clearly these are both very good cameras. What it all comes down to is which one YOU feel better about. Go to a camera shop and pick them up and see.
canon and nikon are both top, some like one better some the other, i own one hire the other if the lens i need for a job is not available in the mount i own, they are both excellent with great lens ranges
of the two i would say canon but that means nothing if you said the D200 or D400 i would say get the Nikon so,,,,,
buy the SYSTEM (brand for DSLR) you can see yourself associated with for the next 10, 20, 30 years, have alook at the range of lenes they both have, other accesories you may like in the future, make your decision based on that if you think you will keep going further in this art
which ever one you buy you will be happy with
a
I hate to be a broken record on this (broken CD? DVD? Mp3?) but go over to http://www.dpreview.com and look at the mind-bogglingly detailed tests of these cameras.
Then go look at tests of the S80 (or similar) and decide for yourself.
I’m not paid for recommending this site, but it’s the answer to about 80% of all the "what camera should I buy" questions on here.